 Staff | CH | May 7, 8:39am | | 29: Could you move this separate matter to another thread, perhaps? Features would be preferred, I would suggest. |
|
|

| elledark | May 7, 8:41am | | #28 .. for me the change I'm talking about took place yesterday CH, not some time ago. Happy to mention it on another forum but I was seeking help here first to understand whether anyone else was experiencing the same problem and also if they knew whether it was a deliberate change to page layout or a bug. |
|
|
 Sponsor | Etcetera | May 7, 8:47am | | 31: no, thanks :) I'd rather post my complains (feedback) on my blog to be noticed. No one reads the Features forum. |
|
|
 Staff | CH | May 7, 8:49am | | 32: I'll seek feedback on whether a recent change has been made. I have been seeing "tiny pics" for a while, but I am a member of beta group. Perhaps that (reasonably long-standing) change just made it to the rest of SU. I'll try and find out. |
|
|
 Sponsor | anitab | May 8, 2:02am | Well, I've been in the beta group for a while. It can't be that.
And I've never seen those small pics before.
I have proof.. on 7 May, it looked like this.
So the problem is with the medium pics.
If this is a new change.. please let me know where to discuss it. Features or Beta? |
|
|
 Sponsor | xineann | May 8, 9:20am | | This is my "me too" post. I want big avatars back. Particular anitab's, since it's half the draw to her blog :) |
|
|
 Sponsor | anitab | May 8, 11:08am | 36: :)
yes. can i just have *mine* back, at least.. :P |
|
|
 Sponsor | Xtine66 | May 8, 2:23pm | | That's one of the reasons I loathe the "beta" look. A lot of folks spend a lot of time finding cool avatars, and then SU makes 'em all but un-see-able. :( |
|
|
 Sponsor | anitab | May 8, 2:48pm | i actually really don't mind beta.
what i do mind is when changes are made that just don't make sense and don't add anything to the stumble experience.
i'm still assuming (praying) that this is a temporary bug.
if it's not.. then expect some more noise.
either way, if you're going to make a change to the look of *our* pages, then we need to know so that we can change the way we use it. |
|
|

| elledark | May 8, 2:58pm | | I've never known anything *but* the beta version of SU, since I apparently joined after the option of the classic look was removed (july 2007?) and I don't have an option to switch to it so my comments about this sudden change to the 'superminipic' sized avatars that happened the other day are in that context. Like Ani, I'm hoping its a temporary bug, perhaps the wrong pictures being served. There was some difficulty recently when they distributed avatar pics between different servers which lead to considerable time lags when we changed avatars. Maybe its more unintended consequences from the same source ? If its *not* a bug then, personally, I think its a bad move which detracts from the individuality of pages. In fact the 'new' sized avatars are so small its hardly worth bothering with them at all. Fingers crossed that its just a temporary bug .:)) |
|
|
|